[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[india-drug] Global Fund Opens Way to Generics


  • From: e-drug@usa.healthnet.org
  • Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 06:54:10 -0400 (EDT)


(Copied from Edrug. Thanks----------SS)

E-DRUG: Global Fund Opens Way to Generics
------------------------------------------------
[Good news from the NY Times re the Global Fund: generic ARVs can be
bought
if good quality. Please note that the report is inaccurate if it wants
to imply that TRIPS is "international law". TRIPS is an agreement
between WTO member states.
Patents are only national, and not international. The Global Fund
probably meant that countries which have to be TRIPS compliant should
not breach that agreement. However, most developing countries have
till 2005 or 2016 to become TRIPS compliant, and are thus not yet bound
by TRIPS. Copied as fair use from
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/16/health/policy/16AIDS.html
WB]

October 16, 2002

U.N. Disease Fund Opens Way to Generics
By DONALD G. McNEIL Jr.

$2 billion global fund to fight AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria will
encourage poor countries to buy cheap generic medicines instead of
expensive brand-name ones, its director said yesterday.

The decision opens the way for makers of generic drugs in India, Brazil
and
other countries to sell far more of their products in the third world,
undercutting the prices of major American and European drug makers.

"It's a big step forward," said Dr. Richard G. A. Feachem, executive
director of the United Nations-initiated program, the Global Fund to
Fight
Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria, explaining that it would let the fund's
money go further.

The fund will require countries applying for grants to do three things:

- Buy the lowest-price drug.
- Buy only drugs of guaranteed quality.
- Comply with international law and their own national laws.

Any drug on the World Health Organization's new list of approved drugs
and
drugmakers qualifies automatically, said Anil Soni, a fund official.
That
list, begun in March, includes drugs from companies like India's Cipla
that
copy products patented in the West, which is legal under Indian law.

The fund was started last year with great fanfare by the United Nations
secretary general, Kofi Annan, in the hope that it would become the
repository for Western donations of $7 billion to $10 billion a year
toward
fighting disease.

Thus far, Dr. Feachem said, it has received worthy requests from poor
countries totaling about $8 billion, but has received only $2.1 billion
in
pledges. Advocates for the poor have been particularly bitter that the
United States has not donated more. President Bush's first pledge was
$200
million.

Of the 30 million people with the AIDS virus in Africa, it is estimated
that only 30,000 are getting the anti-retroviral drugs that are
routinely
prescribed for American and European AIDS patients.

But there was positive reaction to Mr. Feachem's announcement,
including a
surprising endorsement from the pharmaceutical industry's trade group.

Shannon Herzfeld, a spokeswoman for the Pharmaceutical Research and
Manufacturers of America, said the group supported the fund's decision.
"We
believe strongly that there is room for bona fide generics as long as
they
are of high quality."

William F. Haddad, a generics maker who helped create the cheaper
off-brand
industry in the United States, called the fund's decision "a big
victory."

He contended that small countries in Africa, Latin America and Eastern
Europe are afraid that the United States will punish them if they try
to
import generic medicines. "The U.S. is like an octopus," he said. "It's
continually threatening to do `something' to countries who buy from
generics makers."

Mr. Haddad could not say which American officials had done so. In the
early
days of the Clinton administration, the Commerce Department
aggressively
threatened countries that ignored American patents with trade
sanctions,
but it changed its policy in December 1999 in the face of the AIDS
epidemic.
The Bush administration has said it would continue the latter policy.

A senior state department official who is familiar with the Global Fund
disputed Mr. Haddad's argument, saying: "From my vantage point, there
has
been no such pressure. We've been nothing but supportive of countries
who
submit applications to the Global Fund."

The United States supports the right of poor countries to buy generic
drugs
with Global Fund money, the official said. "We don't have a bias for or
against generics," he said, "as long as they aren't deprived of the
opportunity of choosing brand names."





________________________________________________________________________
Missed your favourite TV serial last night? Try the new, Yahoo! TV.
visit http://in.tv.yahoo.com
The INDIA-DRUG discussion group is a partnership between SATELLIFE
(www.healthnet.org), WHO Essential Drugs and Medicines Policy
(www.who.ch), and the Delhi Society for the Promotion of the
Rational Use of Drugs (DSPRUD) in India.

To send a message to india-drug, write to: india-drug@usa.healthnet.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe, write to: majordomo@usa.healthnet.org
in the body of the message type: subscribe india-drug OR unsubscribe india-drug
To contact a person, send a message to: india-drug-help@usa.healthnet.org