[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[e-drug] WHO chief endorses diluted anti tobacco text
- From: e-drug@usa.healthnet.org
- Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 19:29:14 -0500 (EST)
E-drug: WHO chief endorses diluted anti tobacco text
---------------------------------------------
Lancet Volume 361, Number 9354 25 January 2003
http://www.thelancet.com/journal/vol/iss/full/llan.361.9354.news.24259.1
Medicine and health policy
[Copied as fair use. BS]
Critics are concerned that the revised draft of WHO's tobacco treaty
is feeble and meaningless
WHO issued a revised draft of its Framework Convention on Tobacco
Control (FCTC) on Jan 15 amid considerable surprise and dismay at
the dilution of key provisions.
As expected, the text stops short of an outright ban on advertising
because of constitutional concerns of the USA. But it also drops
earlier language requiring the phasing out of sponsorship of sports
and cultural events--widely regarded as a ploy by tobacco companies
to hook young smokers--and of vending machine sales.
The text, which contains new provisions on packaging and smuggling
and introduces the concept of manufacturer liability, will be
discussed at a final round of negotiations on Feb 17-28 before
scheduled adoption by the World Health Assembly in May.
Anti-tobacco campaigners slammed the proposals for appeasing the USA,
Japan, and Germany--the main opponents to a tough FCTC--rather than
reflecting the views of the majority of countries, which pressed for
strong language at the last round of talks in October.
ASH UK said the new text was a "feeble response to the world's worst
public health problem". But negotiating chairman Luiz Felipe de
Seixas Correa said he hoped that his gradual approach would persuade
the maximum number of countries to sign up. This would be more
effective than a "strong text" which was inacceptable to key
countries, he argued.
"The task of the negotiations is to bridge the gap between what is
desirable and what is possible", he told journalists, stressing that
countries that wanted to introduce sweeping restrictions could do so.
Despite her impassioned appeals at the October meeting for an
outright advertising ban as part of a convention with real teeth,
WHO Director-General Gro Harlem Brundtland gave her unqualified
support to the watered-down proposals.
"I fully endorse the revised chairman's text", she declared--causing
bewilderment among proponents of tough controls. "I believe that
member states should consider this as the final draft on the basis of
which they will be able to conclude the negotiations", she continued.
"The framework convention will be an important tool in the fight
against cancers, heart disease, and emphysema", she said, adding
that it should be strengthened by additional protocols on, for
instance, illicit trade and advertising.
The draft text commits each signatory to take measures to "restrict
tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship in accordance with
its national constitution". "Such measures may include a
comprehensive ban on all tobacco advertising, promotion, and
sponsorship", it states.
It deletes earlier provisions to phase out all cross-border
advertising, stating that countries could take such action if they
wish. It introduces a new requirement for health warnings to take up
at least 30% of a cigarette packet, stipulating that labelling
should not be misleading or create "the false impression that a
particular tobacco product is less harmful than other tobacco
products". "These may include low-tar, light, ultra-light, or
mild", it says--but steps back from an explicit ban on such terms
contained in the previous text.
The text is cautious on litigation, stating that governments should
"consider taking legislative action and making use of or promoting
their existing laws to deal with liability and compensation for the
purpose of tobacco control".
After prolonged debate on whether health or free trade considerations
should be given priority in international legal disputes, de Seixas
Correa decided to delete all reference to trade, saying it was too
complicated.
"At the last round of talks, the vast majority of countries wanted to
see health prioritised over trade", complained Kathryn Mulvey,
executive director of the US campaign group Infact. "The new text
in no way reflects the momentum toward a stronger treaty at the last
round of talks. It's almost meaningless--basically a set of
suggestions essentially deferring action", she said. "Philip Morris
will be performing cartwheels at the advertising provisions", she
said drily.
Clare Kapp
--
To send a message to E-Drug, write to: e-drug@usa.healthnet.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe, write to: majordomo@usa.healthnet.org
in the body of the message type: subscribe e-drug OR unsubscribe e-drug
To contact a person, send a message to: e-drug-help@usa.healthnet.org
Information and archives: http://www.essentialdrugs.org/edrug
|